Unmarried financial disputes
Our experienced family solicitors are specialists in dealing with all types of relationship breakdown, whether you were married to your ex-partner or not.
Contrary to popular belief, ‘common law marriage’ doesn’t exist. This means there’s no such thing as a ‘common law’ husband or wife – even if you’ve been together for many years.
If a couple aren’t married, there’s no legal obligation on one party to support the other – either during the relationship or after it has come to an end. This can be a particularly harsh reality upon the breakdown of your relationship, when there are so many other uncertainties at the same time.
There may be property claims that can be made on your behalf, or claims for additional provision for your children. Our specialist lawyers have a wealth of experience in this area of law. We can assist you with any challenges that you may face, including how any jointly owned assets are to be dealt with, and how your children are to be financially supported in the future.
We explain the law simply and help our clients to move on with their lives as swiftly as possible. We can discuss with you the best way to achieve this for your family – whether by mediation, arbitration, negotiations, or court proceedings if they prove necessary.
If you’d like to know more about how we can assist you with your dispute, please contact us.
Partner and Head of Family Team +44 (0)20 7591 3314 firstname.lastname@example.org
Partner +44 (0)20 7591 3320 email@example.com
Partner +44 (0)1892 506 184 firstname.lastname@example.org
Managing Associate +44 (0)20 7591 3359 email@example.com
Managing Associate +44 (0)1892 506 258 firstname.lastname@example.org
Managing Associate +44 (0)1892 506 191 email@example.com
Senior Associate +44 (0)1892 506 305 firstname.lastname@example.org
Senior Associate and Mediator +44 (0)20 7591 3312 email@example.com
Associate +44 (0)1892 489 572 firstname.lastname@example.org
Associate +44 (0)1892 506 316 email@example.com
Representing a party in a heavily contested and complex Children Act proceedings requiring a challenge of expert evidence and reports.
Instructed by an unmarried cohabitee to advise on potential claims for financial provision for children under Schedule 1 of the Children’s Act 1989.
Instructed on behalf of a business man in respect of injunction proceedings with the family and criminal court, financial provision claim, child maintenance tribunal and possession proceedings. All applications arose from a relationship with former partner.
For those that aren’t married or in a civil partnership, the court has limited scope to deal with the assets that have accrued in the relationship.
The court will approach the division of assets without reference to the fact that you were living together. If you don’t have any legal agreements in place to protect you, such as a cohabitation agreement or a declaration of trust in relation to property, you’re likely to be left with only the assets that are in your sole name and a share of any assets in joint names.
Where you and your ex-partner live in a property that is jointly owned by you, in joint names, it’s likely that one of you will need to buy the other out of their share, or the property will be sold and the proceeds of sale divided between you. If you signed a declaration of trust when you bought this property, this may set out the mechanism for buying out shares or the sale of the property.
Where a property is owned by only one of you, the other does not have any legal or beneficial interest in the property simply by having lived there, regardless of the length of your relationship.
There is legislation (the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, or TOLATA) which may be able to assist in establishing a financial interest in a property. For example, where you have invested money into the property by way of funding renovation works, reducing the mortgage balance or contributing to the deposit, you may be able to demonstrate that you have a financial interest in the property.
Alternatively, if you were promised a share in the property and then made a financial contribution on the basis of the promise, it may be possible to prove a financial interest that way.
Firstly, your ex-partner will need to pay child maintenance for the children if they are to remain living with you. We explain this all on our arrangements for children page.
In addition to this, Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 sets out additional provision. You can apply to the court for various financial orders to be made. Those claims must be for the benefit of your child only. The court can order:
- Additional child maintenance, if your ex-partner is a high earner (this means earning over £156,000 per year before tax)
- Provision of a property to meet your child’s housing needs until he or she finishes full time education
- Lump sum orders to meet your child’s additional financial needs, e.g. for a school trip or a new computer for your child’s schoolwork.
Such needs can be more widely interpreted to provide, for example, a car for you to use if it is essential for your child’s education or wellbeing, or discharge of debts if to do so would be of indirect benefit to your child.
I’m very worried about the cost of court proceedings. Is it possible to get my ex-partner to pay my legal costs?
If you are making an application under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 (see above), the court can order that your ex-partner is to contribute to your legal costs. This can apply to your historic and future costs.
However, if you are making an application about the ownership of a property (under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996), you should be aware that this is deemed to be a civil claim, rather than a family claim. This means that different costs rules apply and, if you are unsuccessful in achieving the outcome sought, you could be ordered to pay your ex-partner’s costs.
If you are successful, you may recover some, but not all, of your costs from your ex-partner. It’s important therefore to take early legal advice and consider negotiations and mediation before embarking on a court application.
My ex-partner is a very high earner. Can he or she be ordered to pay more than the Child Maintenance Service indicates?
Ordinarily, the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) is the first and last stop for determining child maintenance. The Family Court has very limited power to make otherwise make an order that your ex-partner should pay child maintenance. There are some exceptions though, as follows:
- If either you or your ex-partner normally lives outside England and Wales, the court will have sole responsibility for assessing child maintenance and can make such an order as they see fit – they are not bound by the normal CMS rates
- If your ex-partner earns more than £156,000 per annum (before tax), the court can make a ‘top up’ order. This means that your ex-partner will pay the amount of child maintenance assessed by the CMS and also an extra amount assessed by the court. The amount will be determined against your ex-partner’s resources and your child’s needs.
- If you are seeking an order that your ex-partner pays for your child’s school fees, or other expenses associated with your child’s training or education, the court can order further payments (referred above as lump sum payments)
- If your child is disabled, and has additional costs as a result, the court can order your ex-partner to make additional payments in addition to CMS assessed child maintenance
- Ordinarily, child maintenance assessed by the CMS end when your child finishes full time education. If your child remains in education after the age of 19, or there are special circumstances, such as additional training or education resulting from a disability, then the court can order for the maintenance to continue for a longer period