Real estate

What goes up must come down after all – this really is the end of the upward only rent review

13 May 2026

Our article of 15 July 2025 posed the question “Could this really be the end of the upward only rent review? As a result of The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill receiving Royal Assent on 29 April, the answer appears to be a resounding “yes”.

This will significantly reshape how landlords and tenants negotiate renewals, options and future rent review mechanisms and how landlords and investors alike assess and manage expectation around asset income streams and investment decisions.

When will the ban come into force?

Future regulations will determine a commencement date for the provisions banning upwards-only rent review (UORR) clauses, so the ban does not take immediate effect. Market sentiment suggests that the ban will not be introduced until late in 2027 or 2028 however, as a result of an amendment to the Bill introduced by the Houe of Lords, the ban will have a limited retrospective effect.

What does the ban mean in practice?

If a lease is caught by the ban, then any UORR mechanism will be void and unenforceable. This means that in practice the rent would be deemed to be the lower of the passing rent and the reviewed amount.

What’s caught and what’s not?

In a nutshell it is all a question of timing.

The element of retrospectivity results from the fact that the ban on UORR will affect “tenancy renewal arrangements” entered into on or after 17 March 2026.  This means that where the landlord and tenant have, on or after 17 March 2026, entered into arrangements for the renewal of an existing lease and the renewal lease is granted on or after the ban comes into force, that lease will be subject to the ban.

“Tenancy renewal arrangements” are defined as arrangements under which the tenant under an existing tenancy can:

  • require the landlord or another person to grant a new tenancy; or
  • can be required by the landlord or another person to grant a new tenancy.

This will include agreements for lease, options to renew (whether contained in a lease or in another document) and put and call options (“an Arrangement”).

Such Arrangements are common and act as a key tool in a landlord’s armoury to manage security of tenure strategy and guarantee income streams for the asset in question so the retrospective impact of the ban will have a significant impact.

To help clarify, we answer the following questions:

Adam Carney

Partner
Commercial real estate

Christobel Smales

Professional Support Lawyer (Legal Director)
Commercial real estate

 Download PDF

None, the rent review provisions will continue to operate as intended.

None, there is no Arrangement as the lease is to a new tenant (not a renewal). This is treated as a “protected pre-commencement arrangement” and the UORR provisions in the lease that is granted (regardless of when it is granted) will operate as intended.

The UORR provisions will be subject to the ban.  This will affect both the setting of the initial rent and any reviews contained in the lease.  This includes an option to renew in a lease or a separate agreement with an existing tenant for a future tenancy of the same premises (but not a new lease granted now with a term that takes effect in the future i.e. a reversionary lease).

This scenario is unlikely to arise because everyone will be live enough to the issue to ensure that any such lease has an appropriate rent review mechanism. If the lease did however contain UORR those provisions would be unenforceable and the rent would be deemed to be the lower of the passing rent and the reviewed amount.

A recap on the main provisions of the ban

We discussed how the ban would operate in practice in Could this really be the end of the upward only rent review? but by way of recap:

  • any lease containing UORR clauses entered into after the ban is implemented (subject to our comments above) will be interpreted so that if the index linked mechanism or the open market review would have resulted in a lower rent than the passing rent, then the lower rent shall be payable – in other words any “upward-only” element will be disapplied.
  • caps on rental increases in any review mechanism are permissible but a collar preventing the rent from falling below a certain level (whether or not combined with a cap) would be prohibited. The Government has however indicated that it intends to consult further on such arrangements, particularly where the landlord has agreed a cap on any increase in combination with any collar on any decrease. It goes without saying that caps and collars, potentially with a maximum or minimum percentage increase, would bring welcome certainty for landlord and investors alike.
  • stepped rents (i.e. fixed increases or fixed percentage increases), index linked rents and open market rent reviews (provided in both cases there is no upward-only component i.e. they can move down as well as up) are permissible and not impacted by the ban.
  • the Act does not expressly permit or prohibit the use of more than one variable mechanism which means for example that in theory the rent could be reviewed to the higher of a rent linked to RPI and the open market rent (on the basis that both these measures could in theory go up or down). Further Government guidance is however expected on this point.
  • the prohibition applies to business tenancies whether they benefit from security of tenure or they have been contracted out and so it will apply to statutory renewals under the 1954 Act. Where an existing lease does not contain a contractual renewal option, the renewed lease (whether agreed between the parties or ordered by the court) will be subject to the ban once the ban comes into force.
  • once the ban is in force any clause in a headlease that requires subleases to include UORR provisions will be unenforceable. Rent under a sublease just as in any other lease will need to be capable of upward and downward review. This of course creates a risk for intermediate tenants whose pre-ban lease may well lawfully contain an UORR, but who could face a shortfall on the income received from a post-ban sublease.

Action stations!

Even though the ban is unlikely to come into force until late next year at the earliest parties need to be live to the issue now because there are immediate implications for how renewal arrangements are drafted and when they are agreed.

    • Review: Audit live transactions and any renewals agreed since 17th March 2026 looking carefully at anything that may constitute an Arrangement whether contained in a lease or the wider transaction documents to ensure that rental terms remain operable as intended.
    • Take action: As mentioned earlier, a lease granted after the ban but which was entered into pursuant to renewal arrangements entered into on or after 17 March 2026, will be caught by the ban. As part of renewal negotiations parties will therefore need to agree how rent is to be determined under such renewal leases because day one UORR provisions will be invalid. Landlords in particular may also want to consider renewing or re-gearing leases early (before the ban comes into force) to preserve UORR mechanisms. Standard heads of terms which assume an UORR will also need revisiting.
    • Consider the alternatives: In light of the pending ban, property owners will need to consider and discuss with their advisers what alternative structure or model is most suitable for them in terms of managing the inflation risk previously absorbed by the UORR mechanism. Options include:
      • Rents being reviewed in line with changes to a specified index such as RPI or CPI (which can of course go up or down though is less likely to fall than an open market rent).
      • Agreeing stepped increases in rent at agreed intervals whether that be by way of amounts specified at the outset or percentage increases.
      • Agreeing leases with higher headline rents and more frequent reviews.
      • Granting reversionary leases rather than options to renew on the basis that reversionary leases granted before the ban comes into effect are not caught.
      • Avoiding a rent review altogether by agreeing shorter leases with no rent review and when the lease expires negotiating a new rent in the open market.

Conclusion

Setting aside the limited retrospective application of the ban, a line will necessarily be drawn in the sand when the ban comes into force creating a situation whereby there are leases that contain lawful UORR provisions and those that do not. The impact that this will have on the investment market is something that is hard to gauge at this stage but something to be aware of.

One thing we can be sure of is that the ban will require both landlords and investors to reconsider how rental growth can be achieved with the ban looming. For tenants the impact will be felt in the course of lease negotiations and renewal planning.

The bottom line is that alternative rental structures have to now form part of renewal negotiations to avoid including provisions which are unenforceable once the ban comes into force and it is critical that all parties understand the full mechanics and potential impact of any rent review clause before entering into a renewal arrangement or a lease. Tenants in particular should be aware of rent review mechanics which include multiple bases of review because it may be that even with the UORR ban, the ability for downward movement is compromised when the rent is benchmarked against more than one measure.

For now, we await details of any Government consultation particularly in relation to the application of caps and collars as well as further formal guidance which will be welcomed by landlords and tenants alike.

How we can help

If you would like to discuss how these changes may affect you, please do contact our commercial real estate team.

You can also subscribe to receive our monthly newsletter direct to your inbox

Talk to us about

Related services

Share